can·ni·bal·ism
noun
1.
the eating of human flesh by another human being.
2.
the eating of the flesh of an animal by another animal of itsown kind.
3.
the ceremonial eating of human flesh or parts of the humanbody for magical or religious purposes, as to acquire thepower or skill of a person recently killed.
4.
the act of pecking flesh from a live fowl by a member of thesame flock.
5.
the removal of parts, equipment, assets, or employees fromone product, item, or business in order to use them inanother.
T: Whatcha talking
bout?
B: What do you
think? ;)
T: The Holy
Eucharist?
B: Yessir.
T: Well we believe
Jesus is God so since cannibalism would only be eating the flesh of
fellow humans we are not doing that we are only eating God's flesh.
B: I know. That's
what I said.
J: But you can't
separate Jesus' divinity from His humanity. He is both fully God and
fully man, even in the Eucharist.
B: True enough, J.
This is why another answer to question/accusation, “Isn’t that
cannibalism?” would be that it doesn’t matter. This is what we
are instructed to do.
Continually, there
are folks who ask this, with a smirk, as though this question
(whichever one they are asking this time) is THE question that is
going bring the entire Church to ruin. They are the same old
questions since the early days of the Church and before. It was
difficult for people to hear, even as Jesus told them in person. And
I will admit it is also difficult for someone to understand. Rarely,
though, do I encounter this question, outside of RCIA, as just an
innocent attempt to comprehend The Eucharist.
I still maintain
that, based on the definition, that it is not cannibalism. When we
receive the Body, Soul, Blood and Divinity of our Lord, it’s not
the same as eating the flesh of the human dead. He is inseparably
True God and True Man and we receive the Living Glorified Body of
Christ. In such a beautiful act as participating fully in the
Eucharist, who is consuming whom, really?